<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michigan and Florida&#8230; Can we ignore them? Post your thoughts.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/contemporary-usa-voting-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/contemporary-usa-voting-rights/</link>
	<description>A fresh take on NYC's law and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Joffe</title>
		<link>http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/contemporary-usa-voting-rights/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>David Joffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&quot;[A] State, or a court, may not constitutionally  substitute its own judgment for that of the Party. A political party&#039;s choice among the various ways of determining the makeup of a State&#039;s delegation to the party&#039;s national convention is protected by the Constitution. And as is true of all expressions of First Amendment freedoms, the courts may not interfere on the ground that they view a particular expression as unwise or irrational.&quot; Democratic Party of United States v. Wis., 450 U.S. 107, 124 (U.S. 1981)

HLS911 =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[A] State, or a court, may not constitutionally  substitute its own judgment for that of the Party. A political party&#8217;s choice among the various ways of determining the makeup of a State&#8217;s delegation to the party&#8217;s national convention is protected by the Constitution. And as is true of all expressions of First Amendment freedoms, the courts may not interfere on the ground that they view a particular expression as unwise or irrational.&#8221; Democratic Party of United States v. Wis., 450 U.S. 107, 124 (U.S. 1981)</p>
<p>HLS911 =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/contemporary-usa-voting-rights/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Without Delegates how do the smaller states get fair representation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without Delegates how do the smaller states get fair representation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newyorklaw911</title>
		<link>http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/contemporary-usa-voting-rights/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>newyorklaw911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-4</guid>
		<description>The issue in this article is whether or not a class of person&#039; is actually getting harmer. Any thoughts? I was thinking Michiganders, and Floridians are not even having there votes counted! What about the democratic voters at large?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue in this article is whether or not a class of person&#8217; is actually getting harmer. Any thoughts? I was thinking Michiganders, and Floridians are not even having there votes counted! What about the democratic voters at large?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/contemporary-usa-voting-rights/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I was stunned when Hillary suggested that McCain and herself are more qualified to be a president then Obama... Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was stunned when Hillary suggested that McCain and herself are more qualified to be a president then Obama&#8230; Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/contemporary-usa-voting-rights/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorklaw911.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Great Article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
